CO129-246 - Acting Governor Fleming - 1890 [8-9] — Page 14

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

new Reclamation. Rather more than half this quantity may be deposited by Hopper Barges. Although the direct saving in cost may not be very great, it will, in my opinion, be more than sufficient to cover the cost of the requisite plant, and an indirect gain represented by a much larger result from rate of progress, and the earlier completion of the work. If the calculations contained in my report of 9th January last are correct, the parties interested (i.e. the Government and the Letholders) would gain £600,000 or say £100,000 by anticipating the completion of the works by a single year. Even if the amount gained were one half this sum, it would greatly exceed the extra cost of the Plant. Mr. Chater, with whom I have conferred on the subject, has suggested that a further advantage would be obtained by the introduction of Hopper Barges, as their use would tend to prevent strikes among the junk masters, and thus keep down prices within reasonable limits.

5. In Sir John Coode's letter to the Crown Agents of 3rd March last, ("Co. desp. 68 of 1896 April) he estimates the cost of plant is obtained in England at about £60,000 exclusive of the cost of erection here. He states that in the absence of local information he was not in a position to form an exact estimate, and he has doubtless provided for more extensive and costly plant than necessary. It appears to me that...

Edit History

2026-05-26 08:53:52 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
new Reclamation. Rather more than half this quantity may be deposited by Hopper Barges. Although the direct saving in cost may not be very great, it will, in my opinion, be more than sufficient to cover the cost of the requisite plant, and an indirect gain represented by a much larger result from rate of progress, and the earlier completion of the work. If the calculations contained in my report of 9th January last are correct, the parties interested (i.e. the Government and the Letholders) would gain £600,000 or say £100,000 by anticipating the completion of the works by a single year. Even if the amount gained were one half this sum, it would greatly exceed the extra cost of the Plant. Mr. Chater, with whom I have conferred on the subject, has suggested that a further advantage would be obtained by the introduction of Hopper Barges, as their use would tend to prevent strikes among the junk masters, and thus keep down prices within reasonable limits. 5. In Sir John Coode's letter to the Crown Agents of 3rd March last, ("Co. desp. 68 of 1896 April) he estimates the cost of plant is obtained in England at about £60,000 exclusive of the cost of erection here. He states that in the absence of local information he was not in a position to form an exact estimate, and he has doubtless provided for more extensive and costly plant than necessary. It appears to me that...
Baseline (Original)
new Reclamation. Rather more than half this quantity may be deposited by Hopper Barges. Although the direct saving in cost may not be very great, it will, in my opinion, be more than sufficient to cover the cost of the requisite plant, and an indirect gain represented by a much larger result from rate of progress, and the earlier completion of the work. If the calculations contained in an sum would au acoclerated- my report of 9th January last are correct, the parties interested (i.e. the Government and the Letholders) would gain #600,000 or say £100,000 by anticipating the completion of the works by a single year. Even if the amount gained were one half this summ it would greatly exceed the ext of Agent 6234 12 of the Plant. Mr. Chater with - whom I have conferred on on the subject has suggested that a further advantage would be obtained by the introduction of Hopper Barges, tend to prevent strikes among the junk masters, and thus keep down prices within reasonable limits. 5. as their use would 314t 3. In Sir John Coode's letter to the Crown Agents of a March last, ("co. desp. 68 of 1816 april) he estimates the cost of plant is obtained in England at if £60,000 exclusive of the cost of erection here. He states that in the absence of local information he was not in position to form an exact estimate, and he has doubtless provided for more - extensive and appears to me costly plant than necessary. I in the
2026-05-26 08:53:52 · Baseline
View content

new Reclamation. Rather more than half this quantity may be deposited by Hopper Barges. Although the direct saving in cost may not be very great, it will, in my opinion, be more than sufficient to cover the cost of the requisite plant, and an indirect gain represented by a much larger result from rate of progress, and the earlier completion of the work. If the calculations contained

in

an

sum would

au acoclerated-

my report of 9th January last are correct, the parties interested (i.e. the Government and the Letholders) would gain #600,000 or say £100,000 by anticipating the completion of the works by a single year. Even if the amount gained were one

half this summ

it would greatly exceed the ext

of

Agent

6234

12

of the Plant. Mr. Chater with - whom I have conferred on

on the subject has suggested that a further advantage would be

obtained by the introduction of Hopper Barges, tend to prevent strikes among the junk masters, and thus keep down prices within reasonable limits.

5.

as their use would

314t

3.

In Sir John Coode's letter to the Crown Agents of a March last, ("co. desp. 68 of 1816

april) he estimates the cost of plant is obtained in England at

if £60,000 exclusive of the cost of erection here. He states that in the absence of local information he was not in position to form an exact estimate, and he has doubtless provided for more -

extensive and

appears

to me

costly plant than necessary. I in

the

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.